Resources

Interventional cardiology sits at one of the highest-stakes intersections in medicine. The procedures performed in the cardiac catheterization laboratory, including coronary angiography, percutaneous coronary intervention, device implantation, and endovascular repair, are often performed on critically ill patients, under time pressure, with narrow margins for error. When outcomes are poor, the legal question is not simply whether something went wrong. The question is whether

As telemedicine expands into high-acuity environments such as intensive care units and cardiovascular services, new liability questions are emerging around response time, supervision, continuity of care, and the limits of remote clinical assessment. What began as a model for routine outpatient consultations has moved steadily into settings where the margin for error is narrow and the consequences of delayed or inadequate care can be irreversible. For attorneys handling medica

Cardiac device cases are among the most technically demanding matters in medical malpractice and product liability litigation. When a pacemaker fails to pace, an ICD delivers an inappropriate shock, or a procedural device contributes to a complication in the cath lab, the legal questions that follow require both clinical precision and medical-legal expertise to evaluate. In many of these cases, the outcome turns on a narrow set of clinical and technical details that are often